Psychoanalysis deals with what unconsciously mediates our relationship to reality. Our “ordinary clinical terms” (Holmes, this issue) include the press of drives and its fantasy derivatives, the history of early attachment and object relations, lifetime and intergenerational legacies; these are the elements that we assume shape psychic reality. As a discipline we are less likely to interrogate the profound and ongoing ways in which we are spellbound by ideology and are less likely to address racism, homophobia, misogyny, and privilege as central. What I hope to address in this discussion is why considering the socio-political is actually quite complicated for psychoanalysi

To cite this article: Orna Guralnik Psy.D. (2016) Sleeping Dogs: Psychoanalysis and the Socio- Political, Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 26:6, 655-663, DOI: 10.1080/10481885.2016.1235450

To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2016.1235450